Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

Registrar's Decision

Registrar's Decision 19-09-001

File Number: 19-09-001

In the matter of Motor Dealer Act R.S.B.C. 1996 C.316

Complainant: Vehicle Sales Authority of BC

Licensee/Unlicensed person:
One West Auto Ltd.

Issues:

  • One West Auto Ltd. (“One West”) applied for registration as a motor dealer.
  • In reviewing One West’s application, the Authority became concerned about the past conduct of the principals and owners of One West related to their operation of another dealership, Surrey Mitsubishi.
  • The Authority notified One West that it would not proceed with reviewing One West’s application until the conclusion of the Registrar’s review of the allegations against Surrey Mitsubishi.
  • One West applied for a hearing before the Registrar as One West says the decision to refuse to register One West as a licensed dealer was procedurally unfair since the Authority relied on allegations of past conduct in arriving at the decision.
  • A hearing was held on September 11th, 2019.
  • One West argued that the term “past conduct” as found in section 5 of the Motor Dealer Act of British Columbia (“MDA”), must be given its ordinary meaning and that meaning is ‘proven’ past conduct.
  • The Authority argues that it did not refuse to register One West but was holding its review of the application in abeyance subject to the Registrar’s decision involving Surrey Mitsubishi.
  • At the conclusion of the hearing held on September 11th, 2019, the Registrar directed legal counsel to prepare written legal arguments on the interpretation of section 5 of the MDA and specifically on whether past conduct should be interpreted as being “proven past conduct”. That process was completed on October 1st, 2019.

Outcome:

  • The Registrar found that “past conduct” as noted in section 5 of the MDA is not limited to only “proven” past conduct. It may include allegations of past conduct.
  • The Registrar noted this interpretation was consistent with the B.C. Legislature’s intention of protecting the public from potential future risks of harm.
  • The Registrar found that there is proven past conduct in the form of prior compliance action against Surrey Mitsubishi along with alleged past conduct that is to be reviewed, that if proven, would be a concern to the public interest.
  • The Registrar “stayed”, suspended the review of, the application of One West for registration as a motor dealer until the final resolution of the allegations against Surrey Mitsubishi.

Click here for the full decision (PDF)