Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

VSA
Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

Registrar's Decision

Registrar's Decision 09-70100 & 09-70695

File Number: 09-70100/09-70695

In the matter of THE MOTOR DEALER ACT R.S.B.C.1996 C.316
and THE BUSINESS PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT S.B.C. 2004 c.2

Complainant: ISSAC ROBERTS

Licensee/Unlicensed person:

MATRIX AUTO SALES LTD. AND MOHAMMAD REZA FORGOHI AND RAMIN KARAMALI AND REZAPOOR HABIBOLLAH

Issues:

  • Motor Dealer sought production of additional documents.
  • Some of those documents were held by ICBC and Matrix wanted an order compelling ICBC to produce those documents.
  • The motor dealer alleged illegal conduct on the part of the complainant to justify the extra document production.

Outcome:

  • The order for production was denied.
  • The motor dealer’s basis for making the allegation had little foundation on the presented evidence.
  • Such a probing inquiry and order for production must be based on some clear evidence and not a mere allegation before an order to produce records will be made against ICBC or another third party.

Click here for the full decision (PDF)