VSA
Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

Registrar's Decision

Registrar's Decision 08-70631

File Number: 08-70631

In the matter ofย THE MOTOR DEALER ACT R.S.B.C.1996 C.316
andย THE BUSINESS PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT S.B.C. 2004 c.2

Complainant:ย LARRY ANDROSOFF

Licensee/Unlicensed person:

PARKWOOD AUTO SALES LTD. AND MARC-JAN BEUNE

Issues:

  • Consumer alleged that Parkwood sold him a Ford pick-up that was not safe and was unsuitable for transportation.
  • The consumer had the pick-up truck inspected by two repair facilities who said the vehicle was unsafe.
  • The second repair facility conducted a Private Vehicle Inspection (PVI) and the Ford failed for several reasons.
  • Parkwood had the Ford repaired by J-Kam and it then did a PVI and passed the Ford.

Outcome:

  • A review of the evidence and testimony of the inspector for J-Kam indicated two items were not repaired properly.
  • Parkwood did not conduct any inspection of the Ford prior to selling it.
  • Parkwood did not declare that the Ford met the requirements of the Motor Vehicle Act or declare it as unsuitable for transportation.
  • Parkwoodโ€™s implied representation and its conduct was that the Ford was allowed on the roads. The consumer could rely on this implied representation.
  • Parkwood and Mr. Beune misrepresented the Ford as roadworthy when it was not. Parkwood committed a deceptive act. Parkwood and Mr. Beune showed reckless conduct in this case.
  • The consumerโ€™s conduct was troublesome. He sought recovery for the costs of repairs other than to make the Ford roadworthy. This conduct disentitled him to return the Ford and obtain a full refund.
  • Parkwood and Mr. Beune were order to pay the consumer $2,518.84 for repairs to make the Ford meet the requirements of the Motor Vehicle Act.
  • Parkwood and Mr. Beune were order to reimburse the Motor Vehicle Sales Authority for its investigation and hearing costs of $559.46.
  • Parkwood was ordered to pay $12,500 as an administrative penalty. Consideration was given to Parkwoodโ€™s attempt to resolve this matter. However, the misrepresentation was reckless and involved an issue of safety.
  • Mr. Beune was ordered to pay an administrative penalty of $1,000.
  • See the case of Re Parkwood Auto Sales Ltd & Beune & Hawes August 6, 2010 for a decision regarding Parkwoodโ€™s registration and Mr. Hawesโ€™ and Mr. Beuneโ€™s salesperson licenses.

Click here for the full decision (PDF)

Click here for additional PDF.