VSA
Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

Registrar's Decision

Registrar's Decision 08-70578

File Number: 08-70578

In the matter ofย THE MOTOR DEALER ACT R.S.B.C.1996 C.316
andย THE BUSINESS PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT S.B.C. 2004 c.2

Complainant:ย DAVID KNAPP

Licensee/Unlicensed person:

CROWN AUTOBODY & AUTO SALES LTD. AND JAWEED JOOYA

Issues:

  • The motor dealer is also a collision repair shop who rebuilt and sold a motor vehicle to the consumers.
  • The motor vehicle was represented as roadworthy, and the repairs that were made were down played.
  • The motor dealer also misrepresented the kilometers travelled by the motor vehicle.
  • The motor vehicle had passed two B.C. required inspections for roadworthiness.
  • The consumers moved to Ontario where the motor vehicle failed a structural integrity assessmentA structural integrity assessment (SIA) is the second of two tests required for a rebuilt vehicle to pass in order to be deemed roadworthy and insurable in British Columbia. A rebuilt vehicle must also pass the Private Vehicle Inspection (PVI). The SIA tests a vehicleโ€™s frame, alignment and other structural safety components (ie. doors and welds) to ensure its structure meets the performance requirements originally set by the manufacturer. A rebuilt vehicleโ€™s rust protection is also assessed to ensure it meets the manufactureโ€™s specifications. and could not be repaired.
  • The consumers complained to the VSA and asked to cancel the contract and get a full refund.
  • Expert evidence from Ontario and BC was that the vehicle was not structurally safe and could not be repaired to be safe.

Outcome:

  • The motor dealer committed a deliberate deceptive act or practice.
  • The motor dealer was ordered to take back the motor vehicle and refund the consumer the full purchase price.
  • The motor dealer was ordered to reimburse the consumers for the costs of inspecting the motor vehicle.
  • The motor dealer was order to reimburse the VSA for its investigation and hearing costs.
  • The motor dealer was assessed a $20,000.00 administrative penalty.
  • The salesperson, Mr. Jooya, was ordered to pay a $2,000 administrative penalty.
  • Due to the nature of the breach and the need to protect the public interest; the motor dealerโ€™s registration was cancelled.

Click here for the full decision (PDF)